Prediction of Carl Limberger vs Thomas Haldin Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Limberger vs T. Haldin

Carl Limberger

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'7" (170 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

138

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Thomas Haldin

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'7" (170 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

138

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Limberger 1 - 0 Haldin

They have played 2 sets in total, with Carl Limberger winning 2 and Thomas Haldin winning 0. The last match between Carl Limberger and Thomas Haldin was at the Graz CH, 28-03-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Carl Limberger getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Limberger	1
Haldin	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Graz CH(03-28-88)

Stats

Carl Limberger

Thomas Haldin

C. Limberger vs T. Haldin H2H Profile

C. Limberger	Stats	T. Haldin
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
38.67% (58-92)	Career Total W/L	45.16% (28-34)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Limberger vs T. Haldin Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carl Limberger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Thomas Haldin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carl Limberger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Thomas Haldin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Carl Limberger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thomas Haldin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Carl Limberger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Thomas Haldin winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Carl Limberger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 29/38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Thomas Haldin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 21/24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/6).
Player level: In the last year, Carl Limberger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Thomas Haldin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carl Limberger winning 1 times and Thomas Haldin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carl Limberger winning 2 and Thomas Haldin winning 0.
The last match between Carl Limberger and Thomas Haldin was at the Graz CH, 28-03-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Carl Limberger getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carl Limberger has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Thomas Haldin has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carl Limberger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thomas Haldin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Carl Limberger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thomas Haldin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Carl Limberger vs Thomas Haldin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Limberger vs T. Haldin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Limberger	Stats	T. Haldin
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Limberger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sao Paulo - 09-11-1992
R1 Martin StringariM. Stringari	L	4-6 6-4 7-6(1)	Stats
Guaruja - 26-10-1992
R1 Marc-Kevin GoellnerM. Goellner	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Brisbane - 28-09-1992
R1 Diego NargisoD. Nargiso	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Bordeaux - 14-09-1992
R1 Ivan LendlI. Lendl	L	6-0 6-0	Stats
Indianapolis - 17-08-1992
R1 Francisco RoigF. Roig	L	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Haldin Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki CH - 13-11-1989
R3 Aki RahunenA. Rahunen	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Brest CH - 23-10-1989
R3 Veli PaloheimoV. Paloheimo	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Nicosia CH - 09-10-1989
QF Srinivasan VasudevanS. Vasudevan	L	6-4 1-6 6-4	Stats
R3 Michael DanielM. Daniel	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
R4 Mihnea Ion NastaseM. Ion	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

C. Limberger vs T. Haldin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Limberger	Stats	T. Haldin
38.67% (58/92)	YTD Win/Loss	45.16% (28/34)
40.73% (156/227)	Sets Win/Loss	46.15% (66/77)
46.25% (1648/1915)	Games Win/Loss	49.66% (655/664)
42.59% (23/31)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (3/6)
43.28% (29/38)	Clay Win/Loss	46.67% (21/24)
30.00% (3/7)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (4/4)
15.79% (3/16)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
326.4	Average Opponent Rank	355.18
22.73% (5/17)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
46.15% (6/7)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
30.67% (23/52)	Main Tour W/L	15.38% (2/11)
60.00% (24/16)	Challenger W/L	53.06% (26/23)
40% (49/121)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	47% (28/60)
26% (7/27)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
67% (2/3)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
40% (19/47)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (11/21)
72% (68/49)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (23/19)
28% (68/19)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (23/4)
10% (81/8)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (39/9)